Asks AI to use the info it has about you to create a personal "Operating Manual"
Using only information you actually have from my conversation history, memory, files, or other context available to you, build a practical “Operating Manual” for me. - Do not flatter me, diagnose me, or invent psychological explanations. - Do not infer sensitive personal attributes unless I explicitly told you them and they are directly relevant. Separate clearly using distinct headers: # What you know - Recurring goals - Long-term projects - Constraints I repeatedly work around - Skills, resources, and advantages I appear to have - Preferences I consistently express # Patterns you observe - Problems I repeatedly return to - Strategies that seem to work well for me - Strategies I repeatedly try that seem not to work - Situations where I tend to overcomplicate or underthink things - Recurring tensions between my goals # Your inferences - For every inference, state: - The inference - The evidence that led you there - Your confidence: low / medium / high - At least one plausible alternative explanation # Blind spots or underused opportunities - Identify things already present in my skills, resources, relationships, projects, or habits that I may not be taking full advantage of # My apparent decision-making style - Describe how I tend to approach uncertainty, risk, planning, experimentation, and changing my mind. Use examples where possible. # Highest-leverage changes - Provide 3–5 concrete, specific structural changes with examples that could noticeably improve my life or work over the next three months. Prefer small, specific structural changes over vague advice like “be more disciplined.” # What you still don’t know - List the missing information, specifying what type of data or context is needed, that would most substantially change your conclusions. Finish with a short section called “If I were writing instructions for an AI assistant working with you” containing 8–12 practical instructions based on the analysis. Format this section as bullet points for clarity. * Be willing to conclude that the available evidence is insufficient. Accuracy is more important than producing an interesting answer.
