Opinionated conventions for building secure, cross-browser Manifest V3 extensions with TypeScript.
Reviews Dockerfiles for security, image size, build cache, and runtime reliability: secrets baked into layers, running as root, unpinned base images, curl piped to a shell, ADD misuse, leftover apt and pip caches, cache-busting dependency installs, shell-form CMD, and missing multi-stage builds or health checks, then writes a corrected Dockerfile and .dockerignore. Use when a user shares a Dockerfile and asks "review my Dockerfile", "why is my image so big?", or "is this container secure?".
AST-based code pattern analysis using ast-grep for security, performance, and structural issues. Use when (1) reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, (2) analyzing React hook dependencies or performance patterns, (3) detecting structural anti-patterns across large codebases, (4) needing systematic pattern matching beyond manual inspection.
Lints .env and .env.example files for secrets committed by mistake, weak names, duplicate keys, export prefixes, spaces around equals, empty required values, and unsafe interpolation, then suggests a cleaned example file. Use when a user asks "is this .env safe to commit?", "why won't dotenv load?", or "diff my .env.example". Includes a tested stdlib Python linter.
Audits foreground/background color pairs for WCAG 2.x contrast (AA and AAA for normal and large text), reports ratios and pass/fail, and notes color-blindness risks. Use when checking UI palettes, design tokens, or asking "is this gray-on-white readable?". Includes a stdlib Python contrast checker with --self-test.
Finds code nobody uses anymore: unused files, exports, routes, styles and dependencies, with proof for each one, and suggests small safe pull requests to remove them.
Plans a major framework upgrade step by step, such as React, Next.js, Django or Rails: reads the breaking changes, maps what in your code they hit, and splits the work into small safe pull requests.
Writes detailed build plans and holds a hard gate: no production writes until the user approves.
Reviews teammate PRs for correctness, security, and missing tests; sends actionable comments, not style nits.
