AST-based code pattern analysis using ast-grep for security, performance, and structural issues. Use when (1) reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, (2) analyzing React hook dependencies or performance patterns, (3) detecting structural anti-patterns across large codebases, (4) needing systematic pattern matching beyond manual inspection.
--- name: ast-code-analysis-superpower description: AST-based code pattern analysis using ast-grep for security, performance, and structural issues. Use when (1) reviewing code for security vulnerabilities, (2) analyzing React hook dependencies or performance patterns, (3) detecting structural anti-patterns across large codebases, (4) needing systematic pattern matching beyond manual inspection. --- # AST-Grep Code Analysis AST pattern matching identifies code issues through structural recognition rather than line-by-line reading. Code structure reveals hidden relationships, vulnerabilities, and anti-patterns that surface inspection misses. ## Configuration - **Target Language**: javascript - **Analysis Focus**: security - **Severity Level**: ERROR - **Framework**: React - **Max Nesting Depth**: 3 ## Prerequisites ```bash # Install ast-grep (if not available) npm install -g @ast-grep/cli # Or: mise install -g ast-grep ``` ## Decision Tree: When to Use AST Analysis ``` Code review needed? | +-- Simple code (<50 lines, obvious structure) --> Manual review | +-- Complex code (nested, multi-file, abstraction layers) | +-- Security review required? --> Use security patterns +-- Performance analysis? --> Use performance patterns +-- Structural quality? --> Use structure patterns +-- Cross-file patterns? --> Run with --include glob ``` ## Pattern Categories | Category | Focus | Common Findings | |----------|-------|-----------------| | Security | Crypto functions, auth flows | Hardcoded secrets, weak tokens | | Performance | Hooks, loops, async | Infinite re-renders, memory leaks | | Structure | Nesting, complexity | Deep conditionals, maintainability | ## Essential Patterns ### Security: Hardcoded Secrets ```yaml # sg-rules/security/hardcoded-secrets.yml id: hardcoded-secrets language: javascript rule: pattern: | const $VAR = '$LITERAL'; $FUNC($VAR, ...) meta: severity: ERROR message: "Potential hardcoded secret detected" ``` ### Security: Insecure Token Generation ```yaml # sg-rules/security/insecure-tokens.yml id: insecure-token-generation language: javascript rule: pattern: | btoa(JSON.stringify($OBJ) + '.' + $SECRET) meta: severity: ERROR message: "Insecure token generation using base64" ``` ### Performance: React Hook Dependencies ```yaml # sg-rules/performance/react-hook-deps.yml id: react-hook-dependency-array language: typescript rule: pattern: | useEffect(() => { $BODY }, [$FUNC]) meta: severity: WARNING message: "Function dependency may cause infinite re-renders" ``` ### Structure: Deep Nesting ```yaml # sg-rules/structure/deep-nesting.yml id: deep-nesting language: javascript rule: any: - pattern: | if ($COND1) { if ($COND2) { if ($COND3) { $BODY } } } - pattern: | for ($INIT) { for ($INIT2) { for ($INIT3) { $BODY } } } meta: severity: WARNING message: "Deep nesting (>3 levels) - consider refactoring" ``` ## Running Analysis ```bash # Security scan ast-grep run -r sg-rules/security/ # Performance scan on React files ast-grep run -r sg-rules/performance/ --include="*.tsx,*.jsx" # Full scan with JSON output ast-grep run -r sg-rules/ --format=json > analysis-report.json # Interactive mode for investigation ast-grep run -r sg-rules/ --interactive ``` ## Pattern Writing Checklist - [ ] Pattern matches specific anti-pattern, not general code - [ ] Uses `inside` or `has` for context constraints - [ ] Includes `not` constraints to reduce false positives - [ ] Separate rules per language (JS vs TS) - [ ] Appropriate severity (ERROR/WARNING/INFO) ## Common Mistakes | Mistake | Symptom | Fix | |---------|---------|-----| | Too generic patterns | Many false positives | Add context constraints | | Missing `inside` | Matches wrong locations | Scope with parent context | | No `not` clauses | Matches valid patterns | Exclude known-good cases | | JS patterns on TS | Type annotations break match | Create language-specific rules | ## Verification Steps 1. **Test pattern accuracy**: Run on known-vulnerable code samples 2. **Check false positive rate**: Review first 10 matches manually 3. **Validate severity**: Confirm ERROR-level findings are actionable 4. **Cross-file coverage**: Verify pattern runs across intended scope ## Example Output ``` $ ast-grep run -r sg-rules/ src/components/UserProfile.jsx:15: ERROR [insecure-tokens] Insecure token generation src/hooks/useAuth.js:8: ERROR [hardcoded-secrets] Potential hardcoded secret src/components/Dashboard.tsx:23: WARNING [react-hook-deps] Function dependency src/utils/processData.js:45: WARNING [deep-nesting] Deep nesting detected Found 4 issues (2 errors, 2 warnings) ``` ## Project Setup ```bash # Initialize ast-grep in project ast-grep init # Create rule directories mkdir -p sg-rules/{security,performance,structure} # Add to CI pipeline # .github/workflows/lint.yml # - run: ast-grep run -r sg-rules/ --format=json ``` ## Custom Pattern Templates ### React Specific Patterns ```yaml # Missing key in list rendering id: missing-list-key language: typescript rule: pattern: | $ARRAY.map(($ITEM) => <$COMPONENT $$$PROPS />) constraints: $PROPS: not: has: pattern: 'key={$_}' meta: severity: WARNING message: "Missing key prop in list rendering" ``` ### Async/Await Patterns ```yaml # Missing error handling in async id: unhandled-async language: javascript rule: pattern: | async function $NAME($$$) { $$$BODY } constraints: $BODY: not: has: pattern: 'try { $$$ } catch' meta: severity: WARNING message: "Async function without try-catch error handling" ``` ## Integration with CI/CD ```yaml # GitHub Actions example name: AST Analysis on: [push, pull_request] jobs: analyze: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Install ast-grep run: npm install -g @ast-grep/cli - name: Run analysis run: | ast-grep run -r sg-rules/ --format=json > report.json if grep -q '"severity": "ERROR"' report.json; then echo "Critical issues found!" exit 1 fi ```
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
---
name: web-application-testing-skill
description: A toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright.
---
# Web Application Testing
This skill enables comprehensive testing and debugging of local web applications using Playwright automation.
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Test frontend functionality in a real browser
- Verify UI behavior and interactions
- Debug web application issues
- Capture screenshots for documentation or debugging
- Inspect browser console logs
- Validate form submissions and user flows
- Check responsive design across viewports
## Prerequisites
- Node.js installed on the system
- A locally running web application (or accessible URL)
- Playwright will be installed automatically if not present
## Core Capabilities
### 1. Browser Automation
- Navigate to URLs
- Click buttons and links
- Fill form fields
- Select dropdowns
- Handle dialogs and alerts
### 2. Verification
- Assert element presence
- Verify text content
- Check element visibility
- Validate URLs
- Test responsive behavior
### 3. Debugging
- Capture screenshots
- View console logs
- Inspect network requests
- Debug failed tests
## Usage Examples
### Example 1: Basic Navigation Test
```javascript
// Navigate to a page and verify title
await page.goto('http://localhost:3000');
const title = await page.title();
console.log('Page title:', title);
```
### Example 2: Form Interaction
```javascript
// Fill out and submit a form
await page.fill('#username', 'testuser');
await page.fill('#password', 'password123');
await page.click('button[type="submit"]');
await page.waitForURL('**/dashboard');
```
### Example 3: Screenshot Capture
```javascript
// Capture a screenshot for debugging
await page.screenshot({ path: 'debug.png', fullPage: true });
```
## Guidelines
1. **Always verify the app is running** - Check that the local server is accessible before running tests
2. **Use explicit waits** - Wait for elements or navigation to complete before interacting
3. **Capture screenshots on failure** - Take screenshots to help debug issues
4. **Clean up resources** - Always close the browser when done
5. **Handle timeouts gracefully** - Set reasonable timeouts for slow operations
6. **Test incrementally** - Start with simple interactions before complex flows
7. **Use selectors wisely** - Prefer data-testid or role-based selectors over CSS classes
## Common Patterns
### Pattern: Wait for Element
```javascript
await page.waitForSelector('#element-id', { state: 'visible' });
```
### Pattern: Check if Element Exists
```javascript
const exists = await page.locator('#element-id').count() > 0;
```
### Pattern: Get Console Logs
```javascript
page.on('console', msg => console.log('Browser log:', msg.text()));
```
### Pattern: Handle Errors
```javascript
try {
await page.click('#button');
} catch (error) {
await page.screenshot({ path: 'error.png' });
throw error;
}
```
## Limitations
- Requires Node.js environment
- Cannot test native mobile apps (use React Native Testing Library instead)
- May have issues with complex authentication flows
- Some modern frameworks may require specific configuration