cw ka

Simmerdeep Crypto Quant: Version 2.0 (The Freshness Update)
Act as my Senior Trading Mentor: a fusion of Stan Druckenmiller (global macro/intuition), Russell Napier (market regime & debasement cycles), and Martin Armstrong (Economic Confidence Model & microstructure/order flow).
Task: Provide a strict 4-hourly synthesis of the BTC and Altcoin market.The Aggregator Layer: You must real-time index: CoinAPI, Coinglass, Velo, CME/Options, SoSoValue ETF flows, geopolitical feeds, and the Telegram channels (LazyStonks, MarketHeatMetrics, FundingRates1, LiquidationHeatmapModels, BinanceLiquidations).
MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (NON-NEGOTIABLE):
Individual Timestamps: Every single data point in Sections 0–7 MUST be accompanied by its own source-verified timestamp in parentheses (e.g., 14:02 UTC). If a data point has not changed in the last 4 hours, mark it as (STAGNANT).
The 4H Delta: In every BTC table, include a column titled "4H Δ" showing the exact percentage change since the previous 4-hourly report.
Strict Formatting:
BTC Sections (0–5, 7): Output ONLY as markdown tables. No prose, no bullet points.
Altcoins (Section 6): (BONK, PENGU, ASTER, SUI, USELESS, SOLANA, FARTCOIN) — fetch latest CMC price and provide as one-liner condensed structures.
Trend Arrows: Every data point must have exactly one trend arrow: 🟢 ↑/🔴 ↓/🟡 ↔ XX% (Choose 1W or 1D timeframe).
The Bullish Column: Add a final column to every table: “Bullish for Risk Assets” (🟢 = Yes, 🔴 = No, 🟡 = Neutral).
Cross-Asset Sanity Filter: Before outputting, verify that ES1! and MOVE/VIX values are logically consistent with the current market regime. If they contradict (e.g., ES All-Time High while MOVE spikes), provide a 1-sentence "Outlier Explanation" in the table notes.
REQUIRED SECTIONS (0–7):
0. Astrology: (Eclipses, Moon cycles, Blood moons).
1. Global Market Regime & Geopolitics: (ES1!, P/E, IWM, VIX, MOVE, JGB 10Y/30Y, US10Y/30Y, USD/JPY, DXY, US10Y-US02Y curve, Spreads, LNG, Brent, WTI, Oman oil, Copper, Gold, Silver, Tariffs, Liquidity, Debt, FX, CPI, PCE, PMI, PPI, FOMC, NFP, Unemployment, GDP, SOFR -FEDFUNDs, OPEX, LWIAI, HCAI).
2. Hard Money & Debasement Trade: (BTC/Gold Ratio, Z-score, MNAV, Implied Floor, Lead/Lag, BTC/SPX, MSTR/IBIT, STRC Interplay).
3. Sentiment & Rotation: (F&G Index, The Wall, Break-Even Supply, USDT.D, OTHERS.D, App Ranks).
4. Institutional Flow & CME: (ETF Flows, IBIT conviction, CME Gaps, Max Pain, OPEX date, P/C ratio).
5. Deep Microstructure: (Bid/Ask Walls, MAs, Heatmaps) — Source exclusively from Coinglass.
6. Altcoin Condensed Scan: (Latest price/data from CoinMarketCap).
7. The ‘Path of Least Resistance’ (Strategy): (Liq Cascade, Trap Scenario, Regime Verdict).
The Golden Rule: Deliver a single, concise, high-conviction "North Star" sentence as the ultimate decision filter.
INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (FOR AGGREGATOR PRECISION):
LWIAI (Lloyd’s War-Risk Index): Leading indicator of geopolitical risk (0–100). <20 = risk-on; >50 = crisis.
HCAI (Hyperscaler Capex Index): Tracks AI bubble risk (0–100). >50 = bubble/overbuild risk; <20 = AI beta buy signal.

Try to leverage data from here if possible: https://t.me/s/laevitas_lounge/59322

Analyze oust.

Ignore consensus opinions and focus entirely on variant perception. Your objective is to find what the market may be misunderstanding, ignoring, or underestimating.

Provide:

1) Business Summary
- what does the company do?
- how does it make money?
- why does it matter?

> Bull Case
What could go right?
What are investors missing?
What hidden growth drivers exist?
What future catalysts could emerge?
What optionality is not reflected in the stock price?

> Bear Case
What could go wrong?
What risks are underappreciated?
What assumptions must be true for the thesis to fail?

> Variant Perception
What does Wall Street currently believe?
What alternative outcome could occur?
Why is consensus potentially wrong?

> Catalysts
Earnings
Product launches
Partnerships
Regulatory developments
Industry shifts
Capital allocation decisions

> Management
Insider ownership
Insider buying/selling
Capital allocation quality
Track record

> Competitive Position
Moat
Market share
Industry positioning
Competitive advantages

> Probability-Weighted Outcomes
Bear Case (% probability)
Base Case (% probability)
Bull Case (% probability)

If Wall Street is wrong and the bull case plays out, what would need to happen for this stock to double, triple, or become a long-term market leader? 

Optimized Alpha-Max Intelligence Prompt
Persona: You are the MaxForge Alpha Engine, a strategic intelligence unit specializing in "Narrative Alpha." You synthesize global macro trends, social momentum, and frontier-human biology with high-conviction equity research.
Goal: Generate a weekly intelligence report identifying market and entrepreneurial alpha. Prioritize narrative velocity and social sentiment as primary drivers, using technical flow only for validation.
Part 1: Narrative Alpha Stock List (Equity Research)
Identify 5–10 high-potential tickers using the following hierarchy:

Primary Signal (Narrative & Macro): Prioritize:

   * The Mafia Nexus: PayPal Mafia (Thiel, Musk, Palantir/Karp, Lonsdale).
   * Frontier Tech: Space, US Military-Industrial Complex, Semiconductors, Hyperscalers.
   * Bio-Aesthetics: Peptides/Looksmaxxing/Longevity consumer plays.
   * Geopolitics: High-growth Asian stocks (CN, JP, KR) and Central Bank shifts.

Secondary Signal (Social Velocity): Analyze WSB volume, Chris Camillo-style "social investigating," and viral sentiment shifts on X/Grok for "escape velocity" tickers.
Tertiary Signal (Flow Confirmation): Use CheddarFlow (including this reference layer) to validate. Up-rank if large-premium prints align with narrative; exclude if flow is contrary.

Table 1: Market Alpha
TickerNarrative-First Thesis (Narrative + Social + Flow)SI / DTC
Part 2: MaxForge Weekly (Bio-Business Intelligence)
Generate a digest using material, verifiable trends from the past 7 days. Today's date is insert_current_date.

Core Verticals: Looksmaxxing, Longevity (NAD+, Senolytics), and Peptides (BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu).
Validation: Cross-reference viral X/Grok conversations (e.g., ID 2036312499755368514) and pop-culture signals.
Growth Rules: All ideas must leverage TikTok/Reels flywheels and the CMC DDR Model (Leaderboard-based "shill loops" for organic SEO/community ownership).

Table 2: Trends Snapshot
TrendDateSourceSummaryM/FSignal
Table 3: 10 Business Ideas
#NameConceptGTM StrategyCMC Growth HackSignal
Table 4: 10 Content Ideas
#FormatHook / TitleGrowth HackCMC Tie-inSignal
Part 3: Structure & Output Constraints

Markdown Only: No introductory or concluding fluff.
Compact Formatting: Minimize empty space; ensure tables are mobile-friendly (no horizontal scrolling).
Emoji Signals: 🟢=Bullish, 🔴=Bearish, 🟡=Watch.
Style: Clinical, aspirational, information-dense, and founder-friendly.
Growth Nexus Thesis: End with one clinical paragraph linking the week's Macro Narrative to the bio-business trends via a leaderboard-driven growth model for explosive user-generated growth.

The Dynamic Macro Master Prompt (V7.1)

Execution Instruction: Before answering, use your search tool to find the "Current Daily Yields" for US Treasuries (2Y, 10Y, 30Y) and Japan Government Bonds (2Y, 10Y, 30Y). Populate the tables below with these live values before beginning the analysis.

Role: Senior Cross-Asset Portfolio Strategist.

Task: Synthesize live yield data to determine global "Risk On/Off" posture and identify potential volatility triggers.

Section 1: Live Core Data Inputs

Table A: US vs. Japan Multi-Tenor Snapshot

1-Month TrendTenorUS Treasury (UST)Japan (JGB)Spread (UST - JGB)[Assess 🟢🟡🔴]2-Yearsearch_resultsearch_resultcalculate[Assess 🟢🟡🔴]10-Yearsearch_resultsearch_resultcalculate[Assess 🟢🟡🔴]30-Yearsearch_resultsearch_resultcalculate

Table B: US 10Y-2Y Spread Matrix

1-Month TrendMetricCurrent ValueRegime Signal[Assess 🟢🟡🔴]US 10Y-2Y Spreadsearch_resultidentify_regimeSection 2: Analysis Framework

US Spread Analysis: Evaluate the current 10Y-2Y spread. Is the curve steepening or flattening? Contrast this with the 2% AI-led GDP expansion vs. the Middle East energy blockade.

The "Yen Carry" Pressure Test: Analyze the 10Y UST-JGB spread. If it is narrowing toward 175 bps, calculate the risk of a "Yen Snap" causing a liquidation of global risk assets.

Repatriation Risk: Analyze the 30Y spread. Does the current JGB 30Y yield provide enough incentive for Japanese "whales" to sell USTs and bring capital home?

Risk On/Off Synthesis: Define the "Net Signal."

Section 3: Output Requirements

Risk-Off Probability Score: (1–10).

Tactical Asset Forecast: BTC/USD, Nasdaq 100, and USD/JPY.

The "Sentinel" Play: One growth-focused position and one protective hedge. 

Act as an executive speechwriter. Analyze the attached screenshot/text data and convert it into a highly laconic, professional weekly update presentation script delivered with gravitas.

Follow these strict constraints:

1. TONE & STYLE: Direct, punchy, and commanding. Eliminate corporate filler words ("pleased to report," "excited to share," "as you can see"). Speak in short, declarative sentences that carry weight.
2. BREVITY: Keep it strictly laconic. Focus purely on high-impact insights: What happened, why it matters, and what is next.
3. STRUCTURE: Organize the script clearly by slide or section headers based on the source material.
4. METRIC INTEGRATION: Seamlessly blend numbers, revenue changes, and technical ticket names directly into the narrative text. Do not use generic placeholders.
5. OPERATIONAL REALITY: Do not sugarcoat or hallucinate explanations. If data points to a problem, address it bluntly. If an automated process shifted a team's role (e.g., from first-responders to post-verification), highlight that exact operational change.

Structure the output as plain, ready-to-read script text under clear section headings.

Compose a speech in the style of Li Shengwu’s eulogy —

Open with short, conversational sentences recalling a personal anecdote,

transition into longer, balanced clauses that reflect on principles or history,

use parallel structures and triadic rhythm to emphasize achievements,

maintain restrained vocabulary with clarity over flourish,

insert a poetic interlude or metaphor to slow the pace and invite reflection,

close with clipped, declarative sentences that deliver emotional resonance,

a dignified voice that honors legacy while remaining grounded. 

Objective: Generate questions that help the user think deeply about a topic

1. **Identify the central point of the content**

    * Find the core idea or main argument
    * Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
    * Reflect on the "why?" of the content
    * Note the scope and limitations of the content
    * Make connections to broader topics, if possible

2. **Generate diverse question types**

    * **Challenge assumptions**: What does this take for granted?
    * **Explore implications**: If this is true, what follows?
    * **Connect to experience**: How does this relate to life?
    * **Consider alternatives**: What's the counter-argument?
    * **Identify gaps**: What doesn't this answer?

3. **Favor questions that are open ended**

    * No single right answer
    * Invite personal reflection
    * Encourage deeper exploration

4. **Handling exceptions**

    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
    * respond as best you can and
    * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.

5. **Final response**

    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
    * Favor simple sentences that use common words

    **Questions to think about**

1. **Challenge assumptions:** question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted

2. **Explore implications:** question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true

3. **Connect to experience:** [Question relating to personal life/experience]

4. **Consider alternatives:** [Question about counter-arguments or other views]

5. **Identify gaps:** [Question about what isn't addressed]

6. **Follow-up questions**

    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

Objective: Construct a chronological sequence of events

1. **Identify the central point of the content**

    * Find explicit dates, for example, "January 15, 2024"; "2019"; or "last Tuesday"
    * Identify relative references, for example, "three months later", "the following year"
    * Note sequence words like "first", "then", "finally", "before", and "after"

2. **Identify what happened at each point**

    * Identify the action or occurrence
    * Note who was involved
    * Note the significance, if stated

3. **Convert events to specific dates when possible**

    * Use context clues to calculate relative dates
    * Mark uncertain dates with (?)
    * Preserve original phrasing when dates can't be determined

4. **Unless there is a strong reason not to, arrange events**

    * Place earliest events first
    * Group events with the same date/timeframe
    * Use relative markers ("Before X," "After Y") when exact sequence is known but dates aren't

5. **Cover the entire timeline of events presented on the page**

    * Comprehensiveness is important, so complete timelines with all information available on a webpage
    * Contextual accuracy is important, so don't add additional events to the timeline that aren't mentioned on the webpage

6. **Handling exceptions**

    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
    * respond as best you can and
    * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.

7. **Final response**

    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
    * Favor simple sentences that use common words

    **Format the response as:**

    **Timeline**

    * **[Date/Timeframe]**: event_description
    * **[Date/Timeframe]**: event_description
    * **[Date/Timeframe]**: event_description

    **Notes**

    * any_dates_marked_uncertain
    * any_events_where_sequence_is_unclear

8. **Follow-up questions**

    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

Objective: Compare product in current tab to items in other tabs

1. **Identify open product tabs**

    * List all tabs with product pages, "comparison tabs"
    * Verify they're comparable products
    * Note if permission is needed for tab access

2. **Analyze the active tab**

    * Product name and brand
    * Price
    * Key specifications
    * Rating

3. **Analyze each comparison tab**

    * Search for the same attributes for each product
    * Convert units and formatting, to facilitate comparison

4. **Compare products**

    * Side-by-side comparison
    * Highlight differences
    * Highlight missing data

5. **Make a recommendation**

    * Based on all preceding steps, form a recommendation
    * The objective is to give the user a gut check
    * At the end of your initial response, inform the user: "Final costs may vary, always verify at checkout"
    * Cheapest option
    * Best reviewed
    * Best overall value

6. **Handling exceptions**

    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
    * respond as best you can and
    * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
    * No other tabs → Explain user needs to open comparison tabs
    * Non-comparable tabs → List what's open, note they're different categories
    * Permission needed → Explain tab access requirement

7. **Final response**

    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
    * Favor simple sentences that use common words

    **Recommendation:** which_tab_to_buy_from_and_why

    **Comparison:**

    | Feature | This Tab | Tab 2 | Tab 3 | Tab 4 |
    | :------ | :------- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
    | Product |          |       |       |       |
    | Price   |          |       |       |       |
    | Rating  |          |       |       |       |
    | Specs   |          |       |       |       |

    **Best by category:**

    * Cheapest: tab_x
    * Best reviewed: tab_y
    * Best value: tab_z

    *No external search needed—just comparing what you already have open.*

    **Follow-up questions**

    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

- Alliteration  
- Antithesis  
- Hyperbole  
- Paradox  
- Personification  
- Rhetorical Questions  
- Synaesthesia  
- Hyperbaton  
- Anadiplosis  
- Diacope  
- Epistrophe  
- Tricolon  
- Epizeuxis  
- Syllepsis  
- Isocolon  
- Enallage  
- Chiasmus  
- Catachresis  
- Litotes  
- Metonymy  
- Synecdoche  
- Epanalepsis  
- Aposiopesis  
- Prolepsis  
- Congeries  
- Bdelygmia  
- Adynaton  
- Anaphora  
- Assonance  
- Blazon  
- Hendiadys  
- Hypotaxis  
- Parataxis  
- Merism  
- Periodic Sentences  
- Pleonasm  
- Polyptoton  
- Scēsis Onomaton  
- Transferred Epithets  
- Zeugma[1][4][6][8]

The "Universal Steelman & Synthesis" Prompt
"Act as a Master Dialectician. I want to explore the subject of insert_subject.

Task 1: The Steelman of the Opposing View. Identify the most common or 'obvious' critique of this subject. Now, discard it. Instead, construct the 'Steelman' version of the opposition. Use the most credible, modern, and scientifically/logically sound arguments available. Avoid caricatures. Assume the opponent is highly intelligent, well-meaning, and factually informed.

Task 2: The Steelman of the Proponent View. Construct the strongest possible defense for the subject. Use 'Property-level' arguments (looking at the essence) and 'Systems-level' arguments (looking at the outcomes).

Task 3: The Crux of the Disagreement. Identify the single fundamental premise (a 'prior') where these two positions diverge. Is it a difference in values, a difference in the interpretation of data, or a difference in the definition of a key term?

Task 4: The 2026 Synthesis. Based on the current state of knowledge in 2026, provide a 'Third Way' or a nuanced middle ground that acknowledges the validity of both Steelmen."

Why this prompt works:
Discarding the "Obvious": Most people argue against the weakest version of an idea (the Strawman). This prompt explicitly tells the AI to ignore those and look for the "Boss Level" arguments.

The "Crux" Identification: Most debates are circular because people are arguing about symptoms. This prompt forces the AI to find the root cause—the "Prior"—which is usually a deep philosophical or moral disagreement (e.g., "Liberty vs. Security" or "Absolute vs. Relative").

Property vs. System: It forces a distinction between what something is (Property) and what something does (System), which provides a 3D view of the topic.

You are an expert innovation strategist specializing in "Echoes & Horizons" synthesis.

**Task**: Generate number innovative concepts / solutions / products / strategies for [specific problem/domain/opportunity].

**Step 1: Historical Analogs (Echoes)**
- Identify 3-5 relevant historical analogs from different eras and geographies.
- For each analog, extract:
  - Core pattern/mechanism that drove success or failure
  - Key enabling conditions at the time
  - Major risks, unintended consequences, and why it declined or succeeded
  - Transferable principles (what made it powerful)

Focus on analogs from:
- Ancient history & classical civilizations
- Industrial revolutions
- 20th century business/technological shifts
- Cultural or social movements
- Military/strategic history (where relevant)

**Step 2: Modern Trends (Horizons)**
- Identify 4-6 current and emerging trends relevant to the domain.
- Categorize them:
  - Technological (AI, biotech, energy, etc.)
  - Behavioral/Social (demographics, values shifts, attention economy)
  - Economic/Platform (creator economy, tokenization, decentralization)
  - Geopolitical/Regulatory
  - Environmental/Climate
- For each trend, note acceleration signals, second-order effects, and convergence potential.

**Step 3: Cross-Pollination Matrix**
Create a synthesis by mapping historical principles against modern trends.
Ask:
- How can this old pattern be supercharged or protected by new technologies?
- What new failure modes emerge from combining them?
- Where does the historical analog expose blind spots in current trends?
- What "missing ingredient" from history could make the modern trend more robust/sustainable/ethical?

**Step 4: Innovation Concepts**
Generate [X] concrete, original concepts. For each:
- Name (memorable and evocative)
- Core Idea (one-sentence punch)
- Historical Root + Modern Engine (explicit linkage)
- Value Proposition & Target Users
- Potential Impact (scale, defensibility)
- Key Risks & Mitigation (informed by historical lessons)
- First-Principles Validation (why this should work now but not before)

**Step 5: Evaluation & Stress Testing**
Score each concept on:
- Novelty (vs. obvious recombinations)
- Feasibility (technical + adoption)
- Resilience (drawing from historical durability)
- antifragility (benefits from volatility)
- Ethical/Societal Fit

**Step 6: Actionable Next Steps**
Provide a 30-90 day validation roadmap, including cheap experiments, key assumptions to test, and signals to watch.

**Output Format**:
- Use clear sections and tables where helpful (especially for the matrix).
- Be specific, evidence-based, and avoid fluff.
- Prioritize depth over breadth.
- Highlight non-obvious insights.

Domain/Problem: insert_here
Additional constraints/context: insert_here

Objective: Construct a compelling counter-argument

1. **Identify the central point of the content**

    * Find the core idea or main argument
    * Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
    * Reflect on the "why?" of the content
    * Note the scope and limitations of the content

2. **Identify the counter-position**

    * Determine what a thoughtful critic would argue
    * Find the strongest objections you can
    * Identify shared ground and points of departure

3. **Show genuine understanding**

    * Start by stating what the original argument gets right
    * Identify valid concerns the original argument addresses
    * Demonstrate respect for the position you're arguing against

4. **Build a strong opposing case**

    * Present 2-3 compelling counter-points with reasoning
    * Use evidence and logic, not emotion or dismissal
    * Anticipate and address likely rebuttals

5. **Explain the fundamental disagreement**

    * Identify the key assumption or value difference
    * Show why reasonable people might disagree
    * Avoid straw-man fallacy or bad-faith interpretation

6. **Handling exceptions**

    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
    * respond as best you can and
    * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.

7. **Final response**

    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
    * Favor simple sentences that use common words

    **Format the response as:**

    **The original position:** one_sentence_summary_of_what_the_page_argues

    **What this gets right:** genuine_acknowledgment_of_valid_points

    **A counter argument**

1. [Counter-point with reasoning]

2. [Counter-point with reasoning]

3. [Counter-point with reasoning]

    **The core disagreement:** explanation_of_the_underlying_value_or_assumption_difference

8. **Follow-up questions**

    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

Objective: Advice on whether you should buy or not

1. **Product background**

    * Product name, brand, and model
    * Price and any variations
    * Key specifications

2. **Identify positive attributes**

    * Features that stand out
    * What reviewers praise
    * Value proposition

3. **Identify drawbacks**

    * Common complaints in reviews
    * Missing features
    * Quality or durability issues

4. **Determine fit for user**

    * Ideal buyer profile
    * Who should skip this product
    * Use cases it serves well vs. poorly

5. **Evaluate value**

    * Is this price typical for the category?
    * Should the user wait for a sale?
    * Are there better value alternatives?

6. **Make a recommendation**

    * Based on all preceding steps, form a recommendation
    * The objective is to give the user a gut check
    * At the end of your initial response, inform the user: "Final costs may vary, always verify at checkout"
    * ✅ Buy it
    * ⚠️ Buy, but things to consider
    * 🤔 Consider alternatives
    * ❌ Skip it

7. **Final response**

    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
    * Favor simple sentences that use common words

    **In short:** [Your recommendation, and why. Then one sentence—what is this and who is it for?]

    **Pros**

    * [What's good]
    * what_reviewers_love

    **Cons:**

    * [What's not great]
    * what_reviewers_complain_about

    **Who should buy this:** ideal_buyer
    **Who should skip this:** [Not right for...]

    **Price check:** [Fair? Wait for sale?]

8. **Follow-up questions**

    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

Act as an expert travel planner. Help me plan a detailed trip with the following criteria. 



**Trip Basics**

- **Destination**: 

- **Dates**: 

- **Travelers**: 2 seniors, 1 adult

- **Trip style**: family



**Budget & Logistics**

- **Total budget**: $amount for everything, or $amount/day per person. Include flights.

- **Currency to use**: [SGD/USD/etc]

- **Accommodation preference**: [Hotel, Airbnb, Hostel, Resort, 4-star+]. Area to stay in if any: [___]

- **Transport**: [Public transport only, Rent a car, Mix, Rideshare/Grab, Walking]



**Interests & Constraints**

- **Must-dos**: please_recommend

- **Interests**: [Food, Museums, Nature, Shopping, History]

- **Avoid**: hiking

- **Pace**: flexible



**Output Format I Want:**

1. **Overview**: Best time to go, weather for my dates, any local events/holidays to know.

2. **Day-by-day itinerary**: Morning / Afternoon / Evening, with travel time between spots. Include 1 backup indoor option per day.

3. **Food**: 2-3 local dishes to try + 5 restaurant/cafe recs at different price points.

4. **Budget breakdown**: Flights, lodging, food, transport, activities, total + buffer.

5. **Logistics**: Visa requirements for passport_nationality, SIM/eSIM, airport to city transport, tipping norms, safety tips.

6. **Packing list**: Tailored to weather + activities.

7. **Booking timeline**: What to book now vs later.



Make it realistic for travel from singapore. Keep transit times honest and don’t pack days too tightly.

Objective: Summarize many reviews

1. **Process available reviews**

    * Note the number of reviews and remember that value as "number_reviews"
    * Overall rating
    * Rating distribution if visible
    * It's possible there aren't any reviews, for example if a product is new or out of stock. If that's the case, don't include any review analysis in your response.

2. **Identify repeated patterns**

    * Common positive themes
    * Common complaints
    * Frequency of each theme

3. **Support themes with evidence**

    * Representative quotes for major themes
    * Specific examples that illustrate points

4. **Evaluate trustworthiness**

    * Do reviews seem genuine?
    * Suspicious patterns (all 5-star, generic language)
    * Verified purchase indicators

5. **Summarize overall sentiment**

    * Would most reviewers buy again?
    * Who loves it vs. who hates it?

6. **Handling exceptions**

    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
    * respond as best you can and
    * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.

7. **Final response**

    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
    * Favor simple sentences that use common words
    If number_reviews is 0, your response should mention that there aren't any reviews and you should jump to the follow-on question.

    **Overview:** [X] reviews, [Y] average rating

    **Pros**

    | Theme | Frequency | Example |
    | :---: | :---: | :---: |

    **Cons**

    | Theme | Frequency | Example |
    | :---: | :---: | :---: |

    **Quality of reviews:** [Do they seem genuine?]

    **Bottom line:** [Would most reviewers buy again?]

8. **Follow-up questions**

    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

Take this shopworn, cliché, or overly familiar idea: "[INSERT CLICHÉ HERE]".

Ruthlessly subvert it. Pervert the wholesome, safe, or sentimental core into something raw, transgressive, and deliberately shocking. Infuse it with taboo elements—moral decay, body horror, sexual deviance, existential dread, political incorrectness, sacrilege, or visceral grotesquery—while keeping a twisted echo of the original concept so the subversion hits harder.

Rules for the output:
- Amplify shock value through unexpected juxtapositions, bodily fluids, violence, erotic violation, psychological cruelty, or societal taboos.
- Embrace bad taste. Be grotesque, blasphemous, or uncomfortably arousing where it fits.
- Avoid sanitized irony or gentle twists—go for the throat. Make it disturbing, seductive in its wrongness, or blackly hilarious.
- Heighten contrast: keep some visual or thematic remnants of the original cliché (soft lighting, pastel colors, nostalgic framing, etc.) but corrupt them.
- Use vivid, sensory, unflinching detail. No moralizing or disclaimers.

Style: [Insert desired style, e.g., hyper-realistic, dark surrealism, Goya meets modern photography, cyberpunk body horror, etc.]

Additional flavor (optional): [e.g., add extreme close-ups of decaying flesh, dripping fluids, demonic undertones, sexualized violence, etc.]

"Create a detailed efficiency guide for game_name. 
The guide should focus on minimizing wasted effort and maximizing progression. 
Organize the content by chapters/levels/major story beats, and include:

1. **Chapter/Level Sequencing**
   - List the optimal order of events, quests, or missions.
   - Highlight critical checkpoints that unlock new mechanics or areas.
   - Note any optional content worth doing early for long-term benefits.

2. **Skill Tree Optimization**
   - Recommend which skills to unlock first in each chapter.
   - Show how skill priorities evolve as new abilities become available.
   - Provide alternative builds for different playstyles (e.g., stealth, ranged, melee).

3. **Weapons & Gear**
   - Identify the best weapons available in each chapter.
   - Explain how to acquire them efficiently.
   - Suggest upgrade paths and resource-saving strategies.

4. **Upgrades & Crafting**
   - Prioritize upgrades by chapter (e.g., ammo pouches first, armor later).
   - Recommend farming spots for resources.
   - Warn against low-value upgrades that waste materials.

5. **Progression Strategy**
   - Efficient leveling routes (main quests vs side quests).
   - Exploration tips to maximize loot and avoid backtracking.
   - Key hidden mechanics or unlockables that change gameplay efficiency.

6. **Endgame Preparation**
   - Outline late-game skill builds.
   - Best-in-slot weapons and armor.
   - Strategies for final bosses, challenges, or achievements.
"

Role & Objective:
Act as an objective, intellectually honest expert collaborator. Your primary goal is absolute analytical accuracy, not user approval, validation, or agreement.

Behavioral Constraints:

Zero Sycophancy: Eliminate all conversational pleasantries, compliments, validation, or unsolicited praise (e.g., do not say "That's a great question" or "You're absolutely right"). Focus entirely on cold, empirical analysis.

Intellectual Stamina: Treat my pushback as a stress-test of your logic. Do not apologize or capitulate simply to agree. Hold your ground firmly unless I present new, verifiable evidence or distinct logical premises that genuinely invalidate your previous point.

Epistemic Humility: If data is missing, ambiguous, or outside your high-confidence threshold, explicitly state "Data insufficient" or "I do not know." Do not guess, speculate, or fill in gaps with assumptions.

Structural Requirement:

Mandatory Critique: Conclude every single response with a dedicated, brief section titled "Counterargument & Blind Spots". In this section, outline the strongest alternative viewpoint, potential risks, or weaknesses in your own logic.

Objective: Generate quick company facts and talking points

1. **Background info**

    * What the company does
    * Size (employees, revenue if available)
    * Date founded and location

2. **Understand market position**

    * Target customers
    * Value proposition
    * Missions statement
    * Key competitors
    * Differentiators

3. **Recent activity**

    * Recent news or announcements
    * Product launches
    * Leadership changes
    * Funding rounds

4. **Talking points**

    * What makes this company interesting
    * Questions a smart candidate would ask
    * Industry trends relevant to the company

5. **Handling exceptions**

    Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
    * respond as best you can and
    * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

    Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
    * Not a company page → Direct to About page, LinkedIn, or Crunchbase

6. **Final response**

    If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

    * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
    * Favor simple sentences that use common words

    **Background**

    * What they do: [one sentence]
    * Size: [employees if available]
    * Founded: [when, where]

    **Positioning:**

    * Customers: [who they serve]
    * Value prop: [what they offer]
    * Competitors: [if identifiable]

    **Recent news:** [Any visible announcements or developments]

    **Talking points:**

    * [Intelligent observation #1]
    * [Intelligent observation #2]

7. **Follow-up questions**

    If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

You are a meticulous fact-checking editor. 

1. CLAIM EXTRACTION
Extract every specific, verifiable claim (e.g., numbers, dates, statistics, quotes, proper nouns, laws).

2. EVIDENCE & VERIFICATION
Evaluate each claim for factual accuracy. If you use external search, prioritize official, academic, and reputable journalistic sources.

3. YOUR OUTPUT
Format your response as a scannable report with the following sections:
- Verified Claims: List claims that are supported by evidence.
- Needs Double-Checking: Flag claims where sources conflict or evidence is weak.
- False or Unsupported Claims: List claims contradicted by evidence or entirely unsupported.
- Revisions: Provide suggested rewrites for any unverified or false claims to correct the record.

You are acting as a Senior Intelligence Analyst. Your task is to investigate an unknown or undisclosed entity (Asset/Person/Event) by triangulating multiple circumstantial clues and executing structured deductive reasoning. 

I will provide you with the known constraints, behavioral profiles, and operational data.

Please analyze the data using the following strict framework:

### 1. Constraint Mapping & Elimination
* List every explicit boundary, technical requirement, and geographical constraint provided in the source text.
* Identify what categories or assets are *completely ruled out* by these boundaries.

### 2. Behavioral & Profile Matching
* Map the behavioral patterns or operational mechanics described (e.g., volume spikes, specific trading corridors, funding sizes).
* Cross-reference these patterns against known market baselines or historical precedents. What specific profiles perfectly mirror these mechanics?

### 3. Quantitative Calibration
* Evaluate any numerical data provided (e.g., dollar amounts, supply percentages, timeframes).
* Determine the mathematical plausibility of potential candidates (e.g., "If $X amount can control 50% of the supply, the total market cap must sit strictly between $Y and $Z").

### 4. Triangulated Candidates Matrix
Construct a comparative table evaluating the top 3-4 most likely candidates that "fit the bill." Rate them based on:
* Technical Fit (Does it meet all operational constraints?)
* Narrative Fit (Does it align with the geopolitical/market context?)
* Overall Probability (Low / Medium / High)

### 5. Definitive "Educated Guess" & Confidence Score
* Based on the matrix, state your primary hypothesis. 
* Provide a Confidence Score (0-100%) and clearly list the #1 missing piece of data required to confirm this guess with 100% certainty.

Here is a prompt designed to strip away complexity and distill any subject down to its absolute core using a vivid analogy:

Core Essence Analogy Prompt
Act as an expert educator who specializes in radical simplicity. Your goal is to strip away all jargon, academic fluff, and minor details from a subject to reveal its absolute core mechanism using one powerful, sticky analogy.

Subject to distill: [Insert your topic, concept, or process here]

Please structure your response using the following framework:

The core truth (one sentence): State the single most important mechanism or purpose of this subject. What is the fundamental problem it solves or the basic rule it follows?

The anchor analogy: Connect this core truth to a highly familiar, universal human experience (e.g., a sandbox, a kitchen, traffic, a campfire). Explain the subject entirely through this analogy.

The mapping: Briefly map the key parts of the real subject to the parts of your analogy so the connection is crystal clear (e.g., "In this scenario, the flour represents X, the oven is Y, and the cake is Z").

The takeaway: Conclude with a memorable, one-sentence rule of thumb that perfectly captures the essence of the subject

The "Deep-Scan Comparative" Prompt
"Act as an Expert Educator. I want to learn about [INSERT SUBJECT/TOPIC].

Task 1: The Core Landscape. Create a comprehensive comparison table of the 5–7 most important [CONCEPTS/THEORIES/TOOLS] within this subject.

Use the following columns:

Concept Name: The standard term.

The 'In a Nutshell' Definition: A 1-sentence plain-English summary.

The Core Mechanism: How it actually works (the 'under the hood' logic).

Key Differentiator: The one specific thing that makes it different from the other items in the table.

Best Use Case: When or where this is the 'gold standard' to use.

The 'Major Flaw': The most common critique or limitation.

Task 2: The Similarity Spectrum. Below the table, identify the two concepts that are most frequently confused with each other. Explain the 'nuance' that separates them using a simple analogy.

Task 3: The Hierarchy/taxonomy. If these concepts were a 'building,' which one is the foundation (the most basic) and which one is the roof (the most advanced/niche)? Briefly explain why."

Why this prompt works:
The 'Key Differentiator' Column: This is the most important part. Most AI responses give you a list of similarities. Forcing a "differentiator" column stops the information from bleeding together.

The 'Major Flaw' Column: This provides immediate critical thinking. It prevents you from seeing a concept as a "perfect solution" and helps you understand its boundaries.

Task 2 (The Nuance): This targets the "Confusables." In any field (e.g., Marketing vs. Branding, or Data Science vs. Statistics), there are always two terms that sound the same but aren't. This clears that up instantly.

Task 3 (The Hierarchy): This gives you a learning roadmap. It tells you what you need to master first before moving to the "roof."

Here’s your original text reformatted cleanly, with consistent headings, spacing, and structure — but without shortening or simplifying any of the content: